Abstract:
ABSTRACT
Procurement of government products and services funded by the State Budget (APBN) and Revenue Budget
Regional Expenditures (APBD) is required to be carried out effectively and efficiently in accordance with the
principles of fair competition, transparency, openness, and equal treatment for all stakeholders. It is vital to
have an implementation guideline in the procurement of government goods/services so that the results can be
accounted for both physically and in terms of community benefits..
Competent government goods/services procurement players are required to improve procurement effectiveness
and efficiency. Competence is defined as the ability to accomplish a task to the required standard requirements.
In order to improve the quality of government goods/services procurement in the public infrastructure sector in
Tapin Regency, it is necessary to conduct research on the understanding of the actors in the procurement of
government goods/services. With the research carried out, steps can be determined to improve the quality of
government goods/services procurement in the public infrastructure sector.
This investigation was conducted out in Tapin Regency as part of an infrastructure procurement project.
The method of measuring respondents' understanding of their replies, linear regression analysis of defining
factors that influence understanding, and interview methods with experts to make advice on current problems
were employed as analytical methodologies.
The study's findings show that, based on Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018, the degree of
comprehension of players in the procurement of government goods/services in Tapin Regency is an average of
81.4, with an interpretation of "very good" understanding.With a medium level of association between the two
variables and a linear regression line of Y = 31,215 + 1,209X1, variable interest (X1) has an influence of
18.8% on one's knowledge of Presidential Decree No. 16 of 2018 (Y).With a low degree of correlation between
the two variables, variable experience(X2) has a 9.4% effect on one's knowledge of Presidential Decree No. 16
of 2018(Y), and the linear regression line obtained is Y = 39,094 + 1.153X2. With a moderate level of link
between the two variables and a linear regression line, Y = 25,915 + 1,932 X3, the leadership policy variable
(X2) has an influence of 18.2 percent on a person's level of knowledge of Presidential Regulation Number 16 of
2018 (Y). The training variable (X4) has a 10.8 percent effect on a person's level of Regulation knowledge.
Presidential Number 16 of 2018 (Y) has a low level of association between the two variables, and a linear
regression line, Y = 31,814 + 1,416 X4, is obtained. The combined influence of interest (X1), job experience
(X2), policy management (X3), and training (X4) on one's comprehension of Presidential Decree Number 16
Year 2018 (Y) on one's understanding of the Presidential Decree Number 16 Year 2018 (Y) is 25.2 percent.
Place the right human resources in the right position, provide forums, opportunities, and media for government
goods/service procurement actors to continue to study existing regulations, time, and cost allocation are all
approaches that can be taken in response to the results of research conducted on the results of the
understanding study. for strengthening the function of the Goods/Services Procurement Service Unit (UKPBJ)
and simplifying legislation linked to government procurement of goods/services, and for training for all actors
involved in government procurement of goods/services.The approach that may be taken to the level of influence
of variables that affect the level of understanding is that more research on other variables that affect the
understanding of players in government procurement goods/services is required.