Repo Dosen ULM

Modelling study of flue gas flow pattern with pressure, amount and shape variation catalytic converter

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ghofur, Abdul
dc.contributor.author Isworo, Hajar
dc.contributor.author Subagyo, Rachmat
dc.contributor.author Tamjidillah, Mastiadi
dc.contributor.author Siswanto, Rudi
dc.contributor.author Ma'ruf
dc.contributor.author Purwanto, Helmy
dc.contributor.author Muchsin
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-26T01:47:52Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-26T01:47:52Z
dc.date.issued 2020-05-01
dc.identifier.issn 1897-2764
dc.identifier.uri https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/29590
dc.description.abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the modelling of exhaust gas flow patterns with variations in pressure, number, and shape of filters on the catalytic converter. Design/methodology/approach: The research method used is a simulation using ANSYS, which starts by creating a converter catalytic model with pressure variations: (0.5-1.5 atm), number of filters: (2-5), and the form of filter-cut/filter-not-cut. Findings: The decrease in velocity is caused by non-uniform velocity in the exhaust gas flow that occurs when passing through a bend in the filter-cut that serves as a directional flow to create turbulence. Filter-cut type tends to have fluctuating pressure, turbulence flow pattern shape so that contact between filter and exhaust gas is more effective. Based on the analysis of flow patterns, the speed and pressure of the 5 filter-not-cut design at a pressure of 0.5 are the best, while at pressure (1-1.5 atm) the type 5 filter-cut is the best. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited to filter-not-cut and filter-cut types with variations in the number of filters: 2, 3, 4, and 5, and the inlet pressure between 0.5-1 atm. Practical implications: The practical implications of this study are to find a catalytic converter design that has advantages in the effectiveness of exhaust gas absorption. Originality/value: The results show that the filter-not-cut and filter-cut types have the best effectiveness in the number of 5 filters. Filter-not-cut at the pressure of 0.5 atm and filter-cut at pressure (1-1.5 atm). en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Archives of Materials Science and Engineering en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 103;1
dc.subject Shape effect, Absorption effectiveness, ANSYS, Catalytic converter, Filter-notcut, Filter-cut en_US
dc.title Modelling study of flue gas flow pattern with pressure, amount and shape variation catalytic converter en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account