Repo Dosen ULM

Analysis of alternative selection for vertical clearance design under Tabalong Bridge of PT Adaro Indonesia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mursadin, Aqli
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-16T23:45:17Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-16T23:45:17Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/5600 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2668-778X
dc.identifier.uri https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/28581
dc.description.abstract Abstract. PT Adaro Indonesia is trying to adjust a vertical clearance under Tabalong Bridge 1 (unloaded) and Tabalong Bridge 2 (loaded) because the existing conditions still apply a minimum vertical clearance of 4 m. It should be in accordance with latest Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 19/PRT/M/2011 that for vertical clearance above national road at least 5.1 m. This specification has not been met by the national road under the Tabalong 1 & 2 Bridges because both bridges were built in the 90s. Therefore we need an engineering technique to overcome this. There are 2 alternative designs, namely lowering the elevation of the national road and increasing the elevation of the bridge's upper structure to mitigate oversized vehicles so as not to hit the lower structure of the Tabalong bridge. In determining the selection of the best alternative designs in this research is based on two (2) things, nonfinancial criteria with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and financial criteria with Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)/Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) method. This study uses a survey method by distributing questionnaires and interviews as a means of collecting primary data. In addition, previous research and consultant DED documents were used as a means of collecting secondary data. The AHP method is used to process primary data to produce a decision from a non-financial aspect. While the LCC/BCR method is used to process secondary data to produce a decision from the financial aspect. The results of the AHP analysis obtained that the synthesis value of the decision the option of lowering national roads was 85% and the bridge lifting option was 15% and the consistency ratio (CR) was 0.05 < 0.1. The consistency ratio below 0.1 shows that the questionnaire data from the respondents are consistent. The results of the analysis of Life Cycle Cost (LCC) obtained the option of lowering national roads where the LCC value is Rp. 44,877,651,669.27 more economical than the bridge lifting option. Then the results of the Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) analysis obtained the option of lowering national roads with a BCR value of 2.33 > 1 and NPV = Rp. 43,442,264,804.34 > 1 means that the option lowering national roads is feasible. While the bridge lifting option is obtained by analyzing the value of BCR = 0.98 < 1 and NPV = - Rp. 1,435,386,864.92 < 1 means that the bridge lifting option is not feasible to implement. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Technium Science en_US
dc.subject AHP, economic analysis, energy supply, LCC, mechanical problem, oversized vehicles en_US
dc.title Analysis of alternative selection for vertical clearance design under Tabalong Bridge of PT Adaro Indonesia en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account