| dc.creator |
Yuliana, Candra |
|
| dc.creator |
Japril, Japril |
|
| dc.creator |
RADAM, IPHAN FITRIAN |
|
| dc.date |
2015 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2020-06-15T04:00:17Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2020-06-15T04:00:17Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/4184/1/B044205010%20%282%29.pdf |
|
| dc.identifier |
Yuliana, Candra and Japril, Japril and RADAM, IPHAN FITRIAN (2015) Alternative Contractual Models of Dredging Projects to Avoid Disputes (A Case Study of the Special Port in Kotabaru). The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES), 4 (4). pp. 5-10. ISSN 2319–1805 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/11649 |
|
| dc.description |
There had been four dredging projects done at the Special Port of PT. Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk. in
Kotabaru, two of which ended in disputes. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the causative factors for
disputes and selection of the best contractual model for dredging projects to avoid disputes. The method
employed was the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The analysis results in the most significant criteria to
avoid disputes in dredging projects, which are technical and quality aspects (43%) and the most significant
sub-criteria, which are the factors of fixed designs as well as complete and accurate drawings (75%). The
alternative contractual model chosen is the Lump Sum Fixed Price contract (53%), where the importance value
given by experts reaches 49%. In so doing, in order that dredging projects do not end in disputes, the best
contractual model is the Lump Sum Fixed Price..
Keywords - Analytic Hierarchy Process, Contract, Disputes, Dredging |
|
| dc.format |
text |
|
| dc.publisher |
The IJES |
|
| dc.relation |
http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/4184/ |
|
| dc.subject |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
| dc.title |
Alternative Contractual Models of Dredging Projects to Avoid
Disputes (A Case Study of the Special Port in Kotabaru) |
|
| dc.type |
Article |
|
| dc.type |
PeerReviewed |
|