| dc.creator |
Anwary, Ichsan |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2020-06-15T03:59:24Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2020-06-15T03:59:24Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/2908/9/POTITION%20OK.pdf |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/2908/2/POSITION%20OFFENSES%20BY%20NOTARY%20IN%20MAKING%20AUTHENTIC%20DEED%20REVIEWING%20THE%20NOTARY%20RESPONSIBILITY.pdf |
|
| dc.identifier |
Anwary, Ichsan POSITION OFFENSES BY NOTARY IN MAKING AUTHENTIC DEED REVIEWING THE NOTARY RESPONSIBILITI. UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT. |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/11264 |
|
| dc.description |
The research aims to analyze the notary’ responsibility as common offcial who conduct contempting of court in making deed and notary’ criminal responsibility in running the deed and criminal liability of Notary in conducting its position. The type of research is normative-legal or also called as doctrinal research. The results of research indicate the form of notary’ responsibility can be administrative, civil or criminal responsibility. Especially the notary’ criminal responsibility is not clearly regulated in the Notary Act, but its responsibility is very dependent on “deliberate” (opzet) in notay’ conduct. In making the deed, the notary shall be responsible for the deeds which are made there or which are intentional mistake, on the contrary if the element of mistake occurs from the parties confronting, so as long as the Notary conducitng ith authority in accordance with the laws and regulations, the Notary concerned cannot be requested accountability, since the Notary simply records what
the parties are saying to be contained into a deed. |
|
| dc.format |
text |
|
| dc.format |
text |
|
| dc.relation |
http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/2908/ |
|
| dc.subject |
K Law (General) |
|
| dc.title |
POSITION OFFENSES BY NOTARY IN MAKING AUTHENTIC DEED REVIEWING THE NOTARY RESPONSIBILITI |
|
| dc.type |
Article |
|
| dc.type |
PeerReviewed |
|